DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 §. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
BC
Docket No: 00220-14
23 June 2014
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL OF RECORD OF FORMER iy
Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments
(2) Case summary
(3) Subject’s naval record
i. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a
former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his
record reflect the reentry code of RE-3R (not meeting the
professional growth criteria) vice RE-4 (not recommended for
reenlistment) in block 27 of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of
Release or Discharge from Active Duty) issued on 7 October 2008.
2. The Board, consisting of Mr. 4salman, Mr. Tew, and Ms.
White-Olson, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and
injustice on 18 June 2014, and, pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the egclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies, and
enclosures (1) through (3).
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
finds as follows:.
a. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 9 September 2004. On
7 October 2008, he signed and acknowledged that he was being
assigned an RE-4 reentry code upon his separation. On his
detachment evaluation he was recommended for retention, however,
he did not meet the requirements per the professional growth
eriteria in that he was serving in pay grade E-3. On 7 October
2008, he was separated and received an honorable
characterization of service and assigned an RE-4reentry code.
Petitioner was also eligible to be assigned an RE-3R reentry
code.
CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the
Board concludes that it was unjust to assign a reentry code of
RE-4.. In this case in view of his overall record, Petitioner
shougd have been assigned an RE-3R reentry. code.
Accordingly, the Board finds the existence of an injustice
warranting the following corrective action.
RECOMMENDATION :
a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that
he received a reentry code of “RE-3R” (not meeting the
professional growth criteria) vice “RE-4" (not recommended for
reenlistment) on 7 October 2008.
b. That a copy of this report of proceedings be filed in his
record.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's
proceedings in the above entitled matter. ,
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN: BRIAN J. GEORGE
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the délegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulation, Section 723.6 (e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
Reh
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4679 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change in his RE-4 (not recommended for reenlistment) reentry code, which was issued on 13 April 2013. At that time he was recommended for promotion and continued service in the Navy Reserve, and assigned an RE-4 reentry code. Such a code may also be assigned if the commanding officer does not recommend the individual for reenlistment.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8651 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the RE-4 (non-recommendation for retention) for reentry code issued on 9 August 2013 be upgraded. The Board, consisting of Mr. Lippolis, Mr. Rothlein, and Ms. Montgomery, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 4 June 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11022-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SIN Docket No: 11022-10 28 October 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Tor Secretary of the Navy subs REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD 1¢0 (9 Ref: (a) 10 U.8.€. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change in his RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reenlistment code. ae......
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08516-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SIN Docket No: 08516-07 17 September 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF él Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record -1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00573-08
The Board, consisting of Messrs. ih, ee reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 27 August 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by changing the RE~4 reenlistment code, assigned on 2 June 1989, to RE-3R. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08462-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code he was assigned on 26 November 1993. b. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 22 November 1989. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that on 26 November 1993, he was assigned a reentry code of RE-1.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09446-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change in his reenlistment code.2. The Board, consisting of Mr.reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of errbr and injustice on 2 May 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. At that time he was assigned and RE-4 reenlistment code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10267-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy Reserve, applied to this Board requesting a change in his reenlistment code.2. Petitioner then served without incident and was promoted to pay grade E-3 on 16 October 1992 e. On 31 March 1993 Petitioner was honorably released from active duty due to completion of active obligated service and assigned an RE-3R reenlistment code.f. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that he was...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05129-08
The Board also finds that the service record entry dated 3 September 2003, does not justify assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code since the record shows that the last administrative action regarding his rank was a promotion to pay grade E-3 and not a reduction. Therefore, the Board concludes that the record should be corrected to show that he was assigned an RE-3R reenlistment code on 3 October 2003, and that he was recommended for retention on 22 October 2007. That Petitioner's naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08640-00
assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. l:he evidence of record the ':he RE-4 reenlistment code However, since there is RECOMMENDATION: a. 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions; it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.